NorthWest Kayak Anglers
July 29, 2010, 07:18:59 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Sign up for the NWKA AOTY Tournament today.  Click Here
 
  Home   Forum   Help AOTY Search Calendar Gallery Links Login Register  

Recent

User Info

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 29, 2010, 07:18:59 pm

Login with username, password and session length

2010 NWKA Fall Salmon Challenge

Location: Youngs Bay, OR
Date: August 21st

Sign up here for the 2010 NWKA Fall Salmon Challenge. For more specific information about the tournament please check the information page here. Entry fee for OR residents is $30 and $20 for WA residents. Chose the state you reside in below, click Add To Cart, and we'll see you there!  

Which state do you reside in?

AOTY 2010



The 2010 Angler Of The Year (AOTY) Tournament is a year long competition in which kayak anglers accumulate points per inch of eligible fish.  At the end of the 2010, the overall point leader is crowned the NWKA Angler Of The Year.  Follow the AOTY menu link at the top for more information.

A thread discussing the AOTY Tournament is here.  And you can pay via paypal by clicking this button.








For all yakfishing hookups and reports in the Evergreen state.

 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Reg change  (Read 392 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
floatin cowboys
Salmon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 45
Location: Port Angeles
Posts: 459


UHMMMM Pizza!!!


« on: February 19, 2010, 08:04:33 pm »

I don't think I am gona like the new reg change for the EAST end of area 4 to take place in May. No rock fish to be kept except blacks and blues with a limit of 6 fish.
Logged

We may live without poetry, music, and art
We may live without conscience and live without heart
We may live without friends, we may live without books;
But civilized man cannot live without cooks
Fishin-T
Salmon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 97
Location: Brothell, Wa
Posts: 435


It's called a "Slow Loris"


« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2010, 03:05:39 am »

F.C. (Matt),

I feel your pain, man.  It's really disheartening to watch, but that's the common theme all OVER the Pacific N.W.  Check out what changes have recently been made for the Port Hardy areas on the far north end of Vancouver Island.  NO rockfish, NO lingcods, ONE halibut a day, ONE hook on one line no matter what species you're fishing for.

I haven't seen ANYwhere that rockfish regulations have EVER been loosened.  Maybe in California?  Anybody know?  Throw me a bone if you have one.  I need a pinch of hope.

Fishin-T (Tom)
Logged

I love to tell the big tales!  Hopefully it's obvious which ones are completely impossible... and then the rest that are merely OUTRAGEOUS will be about 99% true.
[WR]
Sturgeon
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Somewhere....Out there...
Posts: 1977



« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2010, 10:04:22 am »

hate to rain on your parade, but from the looks of things its going to get worse.
one way to fight back is to get involved in the many "fish politics " groups we have going here.  might be too late for cali, seems things are pretty much sewn up there. still doesnt mean anyone cant get involved in the fights in washjngton and orego , tho
Logged

Supporting those who defend Our Freedoms, with Thier Lives.
polepole
Administrator
Sturgeon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 40
Location: San Jose, CA :(
Posts: 5286



WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2010, 07:52:03 pm »


I haven't seen ANYwhere that rockfish regulations have EVER been loosened.  Maybe in California?  Anybody know?  Throw me a bone if you have one.  I need a pinch of hope.


Not sure ... but didn't Oregon just bump back up to 6?

Also, in CA, we had a year where they reduced the lingcod limit to 1 greater than 30".  Now it's back to 2 over 24".

-Allen
Logged

     
yaknitup
Salmon
*****
Offline Offline

Location: out past the rock
Posts: 953



WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2010, 08:14:13 pm »

Oregon bumped the rockfish limit from 6 up to 7 last year and that is where it sits for 2010. Is this a little glint for hope? I haven't been fishing in Oregon very long so I really don't know. Can we get a OR nate' to chime in? I hope that this is a sign of a comeback for them in the area.
Logged

jigmaster
Herring
*
Offline Offline

Age: 61
Location: Sequim
Posts: 35


48# butt off of PA . 6 oz white Dungeness Stinger


« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2010, 12:43:39 am »

Plenty of fish in Mukkaw Bay unless your afraid of a little surf and white sharks..
It's much safer to stay near your computer and whine.......   
Floatin Cowboys when you catch anything in PA Harbor it weighs more cause it's full of heavy metals and hull paint... You feedin that to your kids?  Ouch!!!
Pull off 112 and catch what you want past shipwreck point..  all you need is a Stealth Yak  LOL
 
Logged

..Calm winds and fair seas..
Fishin-T
Salmon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 97
Location: Brothell, Wa
Posts: 435


It's called a "Slow Loris"


« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2010, 12:52:24 am »

Polepole, Yakkinitup,

Hey, thanks for the input you two.  That's just the kind of stuff I needed to hear/see.  Those two blips on the radar might turn out to be an anomaly but it's sure as heck a glimmer for at least now.

I'm also hearing rumors that the halibuts are starting to do better in the Wa. areas.  Anybody have any input on that?  Maybe B.Steves?  And has anybody got any feedback on how things are going with the rockfish regs (and by proxy, the populations) down in Ca.?  I just want/need to see ONE Pacific coast fish situation where things are UNdeniably getting better.

Fishin-T
Logged

I love to tell the big tales!  Hopefully it's obvious which ones are completely impossible... and then the rest that are merely OUTRAGEOUS will be about 99% true.
polepole
Administrator
Sturgeon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 40
Location: San Jose, CA :(
Posts: 5286



WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2010, 06:51:38 am »

Political correctness does not guide my life..Freedom of speech does...

Unfortunately freedom of speech does not completely apply here.  You are not allowed personal attacks on people or derogatory statements about them.  Rather than edit out the negative parts of your post, I deleted the whole thing.  Try again ....

-Allen
Logged

     
pelagic paddler
Sturgeon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 37
Location: Oregon City & Netarts
Posts: 1068



« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2010, 09:14:50 am »

Polepole, Yakkinitup,

Hey, thanks for the input you two.  That's just the kind of stuff I needed to hear/see.  Those two blips on the radar might turn out to be an anomaly but it's sure as heck a glimmer for at least now.

I'm also hearing rumors that the halibuts are starting to do better in the Wa. areas.  Anybody have any input on that?  Maybe B.Steves?  And has anybody got any feedback on how things are going with the rockfish regs (and by proxy, the populations) down in Ca.?  I just want/need to see ONE Pacific coast fish situation where things are UNdeniably getting better.

Fishin-T

Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't ling populations "in general" improving/doing better off the Oregon Coast, it seems that way compared past decades.  The Oregon rockfish limit was raised in the last couple years due to the heathy increase in Black Rock populations.
Logged

"Sometimes nothing can be a real cool hand"  Cool Hand Luke
polepole
Administrator
Sturgeon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 40
Location: San Jose, CA :(
Posts: 5286



WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2010, 09:48:52 am »

This article discusses the Worm/Hilborn article in Science Mag in 2009 ... http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2009/07/31/the-global-collapse-of-fisheries-can-be-averted-researchers-say/

Quote
The five ecosystems in which fishing rates have dropped to at least a healthy level called maximum sustainable yield include oceans surrounding New Zealand; northwestern Australia; Iceland; the California current system stretching from Baja California to Canada; and western Canada and Alaska, up to the Bering Strait. Maximum sustainable yield is the greatest amount of fish that can be harvested without depleting the population in the long term.

I attached the article if you're interested in all the details.

-Allen


* WormHilborn-Fisheries-2009.pdf (571.58 KB - downloaded 5 times.)
Logged

     
Fishin-T
Salmon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 97
Location: Brothell, Wa
Posts: 435


It's called a "Slow Loris"


« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2010, 02:02:34 pm »

Polepole,

In the interest of what I perceive to be fairness, I’ve taken the liberty of removing my own post as well.  I don’t know if it would be categorized as derogatory, but it was probably more personal than necessary and I apologize.

Yeah, I figured that “Dad” might "come down there and knock heads”, but the comment about whining did torque me.  I’ve been getting more and more sensitive to the rockfish situation as this years Washington and B.C. regulations (and what they indicate about the rockfish populations) have started to show up on the internet.  A post that another saw as “whining” and a lack of personal fortitude, I saw as a mournful lament for a cherished group of fish species.  Hence, I took offense.

Fishin-T
Logged

I love to tell the big tales!  Hopefully it's obvious which ones are completely impossible... and then the rest that are merely OUTRAGEOUS will be about 99% true.
Fishin-T
Salmon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 97
Location: Brothell, Wa
Posts: 435


It's called a "Slow Loris"


« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2010, 02:04:02 pm »

Polepole,

Hey, thanks loads for those two articles.  Definitely positive feedback and yeah, that helps.

Fishin-T
Logged

I love to tell the big tales!  Hopefully it's obvious which ones are completely impossible... and then the rest that are merely OUTRAGEOUS will be about 99% true.
PNW
Salmon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 59
Location: Coos Bay / Eugene, OR
Posts: 780


oh well


WWW
« Reply #12 on: March 13, 2010, 12:47:23 am »

Polepole, Yakkinitup,

Hey, thanks for the input you two.  That's just the kind of stuff I needed to hear/see.  Those two blips on the radar might turn out to be an anomaly but it's sure as heck a glimmer for at least now.

I'm also hearing rumors that the halibuts are starting to do better in the Wa. areas.  Anybody have any input on that?  Maybe B.Steves?  And has anybody got any feedback on how things are going with the rockfish regs (and by proxy, the populations) down in Ca.?  I just want/need to see ONE Pacific coast fish situation where things are UNdeniably getting better.

Fishin-T
http://www.iphc.washington.edu/halcom/research/research.htm
Logged

PNW
Salmon
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 59
Location: Coos Bay / Eugene, OR
Posts: 780


oh well


WWW
« Reply #13 on: March 13, 2010, 12:52:51 am »

Polepole,

In the interest of what I perceive to be fairness, I’ve taken the liberty of removing my own post as well.  I don’t know if it would be categorized as derogatory, but it was probably more personal than necessary and I apologize.

Yeah, I figured that “Dad” might "come down there and knock heads”, but the comment about whining did torque me.  I’ve been getting more and more sensitive to the rockfish situation as this years Washington and B.C. regulations (and what they indicate about the rockfish populations) have started to show up on the internet.  A post that another saw as “whining” and a lack of personal fortitude, I saw as a mournful lament for a cherished group of fish species.  Hence, I took offense.

Fishin-T
Hope I still have my wits about me at 97.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v.1.0.6 beta 2 © Bloc

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP NWKA © 2006-2009, NorthWest Kayak Anglers
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.128 seconds with 31 queries.

Google visited last this page July 20, 2010, 02:14:29 pm