Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 26, 2025, 09:33:16 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[November 24, 2025, 07:28:35 AM]

[November 22, 2025, 05:15:34 PM]

[October 31, 2025, 03:49:10 PM]

[October 24, 2025, 06:43:12 PM]

[October 14, 2025, 10:14:18 AM]

by [WR]
[October 12, 2025, 11:41:58 PM]

by [WR]
[October 12, 2025, 11:37:09 PM]

[October 01, 2025, 04:23:31 PM]

[September 23, 2025, 01:30:32 PM]

[September 23, 2025, 01:29:36 PM]

[September 20, 2025, 02:16:06 PM]

[September 19, 2025, 06:43:49 PM]

[September 16, 2025, 09:06:41 PM]

[September 13, 2025, 04:55:06 PM]

[September 08, 2025, 08:30:37 PM]

Picture Of The Month



Guess who's back?
jed with a spring Big Mack

Topic: hey shutterbugs  (Read 3293 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

[WR]

  • Sturgeon
  • *******
  • VFW, Life Member at Large, since 1997.
  • Location: currently 17870
  • Date Registered: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 4759


craig

  • Sturgeon
  • *******
  • Location: Tualatin, OR
  • Date Registered: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 3819
That is pretty cool, but is it waterproof?  >:D


Stumblefish

  • Rockfish
  • ****
  • Location: Portland
  • Date Registered: May 2011
  • Posts: 117
That was interesting, but for some reason I couldnt get past #12s..... anyway. Wide angle and a high apeture (f8-f11)number are usually my friend, that method didn't work well in the overcast and drizzle at ORC. I'm used to scenics and static shots too, that 1/4- 1/2 second delay was a bit irritating and showed up in some shots.    >:(


[WR]

  • Sturgeon
  • *******
  • VFW, Life Member at Large, since 1997.
  • Location: currently 17870
  • Date Registered: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 4759
That is pretty cool, but is it waterproof?  >:D

probably not.