Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 03, 2026, 09:46:35 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[April 30, 2026, 09:35:27 AM]

[April 29, 2026, 12:53:25 PM]

by jed
[April 29, 2026, 05:20:26 AM]

by jed
[April 23, 2026, 08:52:20 PM]

[April 22, 2026, 08:04:50 PM]

[April 22, 2026, 06:50:57 PM]

[April 21, 2026, 01:21:21 PM]

[April 21, 2026, 11:55:15 AM]

[April 14, 2026, 01:34:20 PM]

[April 10, 2026, 02:31:33 PM]

[April 08, 2026, 03:35:55 PM]

[April 08, 2026, 10:18:44 AM]

[April 06, 2026, 09:30:33 AM]

[March 17, 2026, 07:16:59 PM]

[March 17, 2026, 07:14:01 PM]

Picture Of The Month



Soaker with a spring sturgeon

Topic: salmon Plug Lakers  (Read 7301 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

polepole

  • Administrator
  • Sturgeon
  • *****
  • NorthWest Kayak Anglers
  • Location: San Jose, CA :(
  • Date Registered: Apr 2006
  • Posts: 10099
not sure if going to 65 # spectra will buy me a real improvement on drag reduction......

Not knowing the exact diameter of the lines in questions, and just going by the ratio of the breaking strength being proportionate to the ratio of the cross-sectional area (which is a function radius), 65# spectra would be around 60% the diameter of 175#.  That is ... if I did my math right.

I've never lost a rigger ball using 65# spectra.  I do retie the bottom 1-2 feet if I notice any chaffing.

-Allen