Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 18, 2025, 10:10:59 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

by PNW
[August 16, 2025, 10:51:59 AM]

[August 15, 2025, 05:52:58 PM]

[August 12, 2025, 06:14:41 PM]

[August 11, 2025, 09:29:11 AM]

[August 08, 2025, 12:28:19 PM]

[August 08, 2025, 11:19:57 AM]

[August 08, 2025, 11:11:23 AM]

[August 08, 2025, 10:59:41 AM]

[August 07, 2025, 07:03:21 AM]

by jed
[August 05, 2025, 07:31:48 PM]

[August 02, 2025, 05:52:47 PM]

[July 30, 2025, 08:15:00 AM]

[July 28, 2025, 04:41:44 PM]

[July 18, 2025, 08:03:26 PM]

[July 12, 2025, 02:02:10 PM]

Picture Of The Month



Guess who's back?
jed with a spring Big Mack

Topic: Cabezon Retention Prohibited  (Read 4803 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ling Banger

  • Sturgeon
  • *******
  • Location: Lincoln Beach, OR
  • Date Registered: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 2589
chumchum said on FB that there was an unusually high number of violations due to misidentification. So a good portion of the quota was gone before 7/1.
"We're going to go fishing
And that's all there is to it." - R.P. McMurphy


Captain Redbeard

  • Lauren
  • Global Moderator
  • Sturgeon
  • *****
  • Location: Portland, OR
  • Date Registered: May 2013
  • Posts: 3340
chumchum said on FB that there was an unusually high number of violations due to misidentification. So a good portion of the quota was gone before 7/1.

Seriously? What on earth do you misidentify a cabezon as? The only thing I can think of that's close is a red irish lord, which most people don't keep anyway.  :dontknow:


Matt M

  • Sturgeon
  • *******
  • Location: Tigard
  • Date Registered: Mar 2016
  • Posts: 1267
For real, I am not sure how you would misidentify a Cabezon, although with the number of them I have caught in the last couple of years it was likely a "Whoops I didn't know that it wasn't a ling" (because not legal to retain) sort of misidentify.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2018, 11:34:42 AM by Matt M »
-Matt

Old Town Sportsman 120 PDL


PNW

  • Teutrowenia pellucida (Googly-eyed glass squid)
  • Sturgeon
  • *******
  • Paul
  • My Facebook page
  • Location: Eugene, OR
  • Date Registered: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2456
My first thought was that the commercial versus recreational quota proportions are way out of whack. 50/50 across the board seems more fair. Also - the recreational & commercial quotas being managed independently of each other looks to me like a political decision more than a biological one.

I'd be okay with a slot limit of 18 to 28 inches.

I also think a single species population survey is an inefficient & time consuming way to gather data. I'd like to see these surveys consolidated, completed & analyzed in a more timely manner so we don't have to wait twelve years for updated information.

I'm also wondering where the revenue from our licenses & tags go. In the meeting the ODFW staff were talking about the increase in charter trips the last two years. Has license & tag revenue increased proportionally? IMO - every dime of this revenue should be going back into ODFW fish & wildlife management programs.


Clayman

  • Salmon
  • ******
  • Location: Newport, OR
  • Date Registered: Feb 2017
  • Posts: 830
chumchum said on FB that there was an unusually high number of violations due to misidentification. So a good portion of the quota was gone before 7/1.

Seriously? What on earth do you misidentify a cabezon as? The only thing I can think of that's close is a red irish lord, which most people don't keep anyway.  :dontknow:
As hard as it is to believe, I believe it.  I remember a post on the Waldport Community FB page this spring of a guy bragging about all the bottomfish he caught.  Laid out on the lawn among the rockfish and lings in his photo were three big cabezon.  Guy was utterly clueless.
aMayesing Bros.


 

anything