Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 13, 2025, 06:17:11 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

by [WR]
[October 12, 2025, 11:41:58 PM]

by [WR]
[October 12, 2025, 11:37:09 PM]

[October 12, 2025, 06:19:28 PM]

[October 09, 2025, 07:48:52 PM]

[October 04, 2025, 04:37:17 PM]

[October 01, 2025, 04:23:31 PM]

[September 23, 2025, 01:30:32 PM]

[September 23, 2025, 01:29:36 PM]

[September 20, 2025, 02:16:06 PM]

[September 19, 2025, 06:43:49 PM]

[September 16, 2025, 09:06:41 PM]

[September 13, 2025, 04:55:06 PM]

[September 08, 2025, 08:30:37 PM]

[September 04, 2025, 03:31:25 PM]

by Shad
[September 03, 2025, 11:53:58 AM]

Picture Of The Month



Guess who's back?
jed with a spring Big Mack
 

Topic: Ling Cod Shilshole Jetty  (Read 4509 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pugetsound

  • Herring
  • **
  • Yaktrap is the coolest photographer ever.
  • Location: Ballard
  • Date Registered: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 44
I have been scouring the regs for reasons to not fish along the outside of that jetty. So far I haven't found any reason I can't fish it but I am not the brightest bulb in the package. Do any of you know of any reason why I couldn't fish it (outside of there being no ling there)?

Thanks Nate
"Fortiter in re, suaviter in modo"


Lee

  • Iris
  • Sturgeon
  • *******
  • Fuck Cancer!
  • Location: Graham, WA
  • Date Registered: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6091
 


pugetsound

  • Herring
  • **
  • Yaktrap is the coolest photographer ever.
  • Location: Ballard
  • Date Registered: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 44
« Last Edit: May 21, 2013, 09:43:39 AM by pugetsound »
"Fortiter in re, suaviter in modo"


polepole

  • Administrator
  • Sturgeon
  • *****
  • NorthWest Kayak Anglers
  • Location: San Jose, CA :(
  • Date Registered: Apr 2006
  • Posts: 10099
As far as I know, you can fish there, and there are lings there.

-Allen


cjb

  • Rockfish
  • ****
  • Location: Seattle
  • Date Registered: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 172
http://www.northwestkayakanglers.com/index.php?topic=2242.msg19685#msg19685

It's an older thread, but I wonder if the lingcod populations on the local jetties have rebounded in size and decreased in fecal coliform content in the years since.  I imagine those populations still get a lot of pressure given how easy they are to access.
-Craig

'12 Red Hobie Revo 11
"Red Rocket"


THEFILTHYOAR

  • Rockfish
  • ****
  • Location: everett washington
  • Date Registered: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 194
I just fished shilshole and smith cove saturday. No fish didn't see anyone hooking up. Ok no lings I should say. Rockfish yes. And flounder plentius. Rhats all I could find. Tried sanddab point wilsons in a few color patterns,  grubs, scampies. Not the best ling water there. The rocks are close and the bottom is muddy. And you get to see giant rats eating barnacles . Pretty nasty


Gone Fishing

  • Plankton
  • *
  • Location: Kent, WA
  • Date Registered: May 2013
  • Posts: 5
You bet! I have bonked several longs there.


pugetsound

  • Herring
  • **
  • Yaktrap is the coolest photographer ever.
  • Location: Ballard
  • Date Registered: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 44
CJB, I hear ya. I would be more concerned about population density than I am about fecal coliform. I think I have eaten flounder from that area once in fifteen years without issue but that doesn't mean things couldn't go south.

http://www.eopugetsound.org/science-review/section-6-marine-fecal-bacteria
"Fortiter in re, suaviter in modo"