Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 21, 2026, 04:05:50 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[June 16, 2026, 07:26:45 AM]

[June 15, 2026, 05:06:57 PM]

[June 10, 2026, 01:04:22 PM]

[June 02, 2026, 05:33:05 PM]

[June 02, 2026, 04:19:31 PM]

[June 02, 2026, 04:02:16 PM]

[June 02, 2026, 06:57:24 AM]

[May 31, 2026, 05:00:58 PM]

[May 31, 2026, 01:45:27 PM]

[May 31, 2026, 06:06:26 AM]

[May 30, 2026, 10:43:42 AM]

[May 30, 2026, 09:15:33 AM]

[May 27, 2026, 05:21:24 AM]

[May 23, 2026, 03:57:46 PM]

[May 13, 2026, 04:42:56 PM]

Picture Of The Month



Soaker with a spring sturgeon

Topic: WA bottomfish rule changes  (Read 4553 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

no_oil_needed

  • Lingcod
  • *****
  • Location: Lake Washington
  • Date Registered: May 2013
  • Posts: 256
Relax. You'll live longer.


Northwoods

  • Sturgeon
  • *******
  • Formerly sumpNZ
  • Location: Sedro-Woolley, WA
  • Date Registered: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 2308
I guess I'm OK with the cutback in retention limits if the black rockfish really are being pressured more than they can handle.  I'm not so happy about axing the minimum length on ling cod.  Though, I guess, more people keeping the small ones will leave the bigger ones (that are more often females) to breed. 

Personally, I still probably won't keep a ling under 22" as even at that length they are almost not worth the effort to fillet.  Especially knowing the bigger ones are out there.
Formerly sumpNZ
2012 ORC 5th Place