Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 07, 2025, 06:27:26 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Topics

[December 06, 2025, 08:01:30 PM]

[December 06, 2025, 06:36:10 PM]

[December 04, 2025, 06:40:08 PM]

[November 29, 2025, 05:43:54 AM]

[November 27, 2025, 07:46:39 PM]

[November 24, 2025, 07:28:35 AM]

[October 31, 2025, 03:49:10 PM]

[October 24, 2025, 06:43:12 PM]

[October 14, 2025, 10:14:18 AM]

by [WR]
[October 12, 2025, 11:41:58 PM]

by [WR]
[October 12, 2025, 11:37:09 PM]

[October 01, 2025, 04:23:31 PM]

[September 23, 2025, 01:30:32 PM]

[September 23, 2025, 01:29:36 PM]

[September 20, 2025, 02:16:06 PM]

Picture Of The Month



Guess who's back?
jed with a spring Big Mack

Topic: 2026 Bottom fishing changes  (Read 72 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rogerdodger

  • Fish Retriever
  • Sturgeon
  • *******
  • roger
  • Location: Florence OR
  • Date Registered: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1622
from todays e-mail from ODFW, great news on lingcod, still a bit of uncertainty about our year round season (see below for more on that):
-------------------
"Key proposed changes for 2026 are:

Lingcod: The daily catch limit would increase from 2 to 3 fish under the staff proposal, since their populations are healthy and bycatch of yelloweye rockfish (a protected species) is still low.

Rockfish: The black rockfish harvest guideline for 2026 is slightly higher than last year but remains below levels prior to 2024. Under the staff proposal, the daily limit for marine rockfish would stay at 4 fish all year, with a sub bag limit of 2 canary rockfish.
In 2025, the planned 5-fish summertime limit had to be reduced to 3 fish in September because of high fishing activity and success. ODFW is working with coastal anglers to understand their preferences for managing black rockfish which are the main driver of the general marine bag limit and season. Some are now leaning toward higher daily limits, even if it means a shorter season — which could influence future rules.
---------------

What caught my eye in the presentation made in October (attached) was on slide 23.  It's basically the correct (obvious) conclusion that you could close bottom fishing for 4 months during the winter and it doesn't help much.  If you want a 5 fish bag limit, it requires a shorter season and you can't get that by closing winter months (when some/many of us enjoy lingcod fishing and don't care how low the marine bag limit is).  My view is that it's best to just accept that there are going to be in-season changes or accept a reduced black rockfish sub-bag limit and manage to use up all the quota available with a year round fishery.

cheers, roger
2019 Hobie Outback (Fish Retriever)



Clayman

  • Salmon
  • ******
  • Location: Newport, OR
  • Date Registered: Feb 2017
  • Posts: 836
A 3-lingcod daily limit would be fantastic. I'd hope an "extra" lingcod in the bag might make a reduced RF bag limit more palatable for some folks. Besides, lingcod tastes better than rockfish. Prove me wrong!  :D

Regarding black RF, why not put a sub-bag limit on them like they're proposing for canaries? Is the CnR mortality for nearshore blacks really that high to negate the benefits of a sub-bag limit?

I really hope we can stick with the year-round bottomfish seasons. Those little windows of nice ocean in the winter usually result in lights-out bottomfishing.
aMayesing Bros.


rogerdodger

  • Fish Retriever
  • Sturgeon
  • *******
  • roger
  • Location: Florence OR
  • Date Registered: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1622
totally agree, the option of a 5 marine bag limit with 3 sub-bag for black rockfish limit seems like an obvious winner.
2019 Hobie Outback (Fish Retriever)



 

anything